Process Capability
Process capability compares stable process variation with specification limits.
It is not a control chart.
Use it only after statistical stability is established.[1]
Prerequisites
Prerequisites: control charts, sample mean, sample standard deviation.
Process Context
Use capability indices when a process is in control and the question is whether output fits customer, engineering, or regulatory requirements.
Definition
For a two-sided specification with lower specification limit
Assumptions / Requirements
- The process is stable.
- Observations are independent enough for the estimate used.
- The distribution model is appropriate; the classical formulas assume approximate normality.
- Specification limits are real requirements, not control limits.
Notation
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
|
|
Upper specification limit |
|
|
Lower specification limit |
|
|
Target value |
|
|
Process mean and standard deviation |
|
|
Sample estimates |
Procedure
- Verify control-chart stability.
- Estimate
and from representative data. - Check distribution shape and measurement system adequacy.
- Calculate capability.
- Improve centering or variation if capability is insufficient.
Worked Example
A shaft has
The spread could be adequate if centered, but the process mean is too close to the USL.
Common Mistakes
- Calculating capability from unstable data.
- Reporting only
when the process is off-center. - Confusing LSL/USL with LCL/UCL.
- Assuming normal capability formulas are valid for strongly nonnormal data.
Connections
| Related note | Use |
|---|---|
| Control Limits and Specification Limits | Required distinction |
| Control charts | Stability prerequisite |
| Quadratic loss function | Target-centered quality |
| Common-Cause and Special-Cause Variation | Stability interpretation |
References
NIST/SEMATECH, e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, "What is Process Capability?", https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pmc/section1/pmc16.htm ↩︎